While the FNMR values can only be truly interpreted with other factors, our results show that the device has rather large FNMR, but not exceptionally. Compared to its "smaller sibling", the iEvo Micro, the performance is noticeably better. As such, the device is in the better part of the category.
Considering the ARAD values - the required time for a successful identification - the device performed averagely. Compared to the iEvo Micro, identification times are longer, the manufacturer traded speed for more reliable identification. Nevertheless, the device can still be conveniently used with these values.